CO129-121 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [3-4] — Page 349

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

#

of the man who

proceeding-

The "Portland.

aering

who rells

as

346 "werkrever

i

me

to is flock on this day the Cumminses

against Mr. Lokscheid and

as much

the above report

unas

the Case; vinz; that

No

a

were

Aund- could be

of

given

in evidence

was

given

with this important difference that the printer said that he had made

a mistake when he told

2

a

me to a boy

the Corlies on board the Portland came from

the Kaving Tiring Fat House at

Kroong the Re Http house at Manchai

with

it; that the women

Syngspoon; that

was in Connection

in that house

were

intended for the "Portland", that Mr. Lotscheid

engaged to a boy who

who is

had taken

away but that it was

the printed notice &

Man

come

one

detention of

there

women

he did not

in the the

Murto. And the person who had on Saturday previous told me he had seen

Ao a

had

boy enter the house Twice, said he

made

A

mistake it was not him. The people of the house also denied

or any one

engaged

the

Ow a fos, the

now in prison for the unlawful

Although therefore

the Case broke down from the

positive

were

want of any

evidence that Mr. Lobscheid and It's a boy

personally Connected with the he. Siphong

I think it follows,

more

especially Considering

the Character of the Chimese; the As a boy

any

was

all knowledge of them thing else. The charge naturally therefore fell to the ground; but in addition to the statements that Mr. Lobscheid has chosen to publish. I have now the Testimony

fully

aware of

the existence of this Aing;

and it would seem reasonable to

expect

that

Chinese

for

Mr. Lobscheid having had dealings with the Chose

Edit History

2026-05-19 17:27:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
# of the man who proceeding- The "Portland. aering who rells as 346 "werkrever i me to is flock on this day the Cumminses against Mr. Lokscheid and as much the above report unas the Case; vinz; that No a were Aund- could be of given in evidence was given with this important difference that the printer said that he had made a mistake when he told 2 a me to a boy the Corlies on board the Portland came from the Kaving Tiring Fat House at Kroong the Re Http house at Manchai with it; that the women Syngspoon; that was in Connection in that house were intended for the "Portland", that Mr. Lotscheid engaged to a boy who who is had taken away but that it was the printed notice & Man come one detention of there women he did not in the the Murto. And the person who had on Saturday previous told me he had seen Ao a had boy enter the house Twice, said he made A mistake it was not him. The people of the house also denied or any one engaged the Ow a fos, the now in prison for the unlawful Although therefore the Case broke down from the positive were want of any evidence that Mr. Lobscheid and It's a boy personally Connected with the he. Siphong I think it follows, more especially Considering the Character of the Chimese; the As a boy any was all knowledge of them thing else. The charge naturally therefore fell to the ground; but in addition to the statements that Mr. Lobscheid has chosen to publish. I have now the Testimony fully aware of the existence of this Aing; and it would seem reasonable to expect that Chinese for Mr. Lobscheid having had dealings with the Chose
Baseline (Original)
bound board all the Fine Convinced not more to do with her her # of the man who proceedingo- The "Portland. aering who rells as 346 "werkrever i me مة to is flock on this day the Cumminses against Mr. Lokscheid and as much the above report unas the Case; vinz; that No a were Aund- could be of given in widence was given مد with this important difference that the printer said that he had mad mistake when he told 2 a me to a loy the Corlies on board the Portland came from the Kaving Tiring Fat House at Kroong the Re Http house at Manchai with it; that the women Syngspoon; that was in Connection in that house were intended for the "Fortland", that Mr. Lotscheid engaged to a boy who who is had taken away but that it was the printed notice & Man come one detention of there women he did not in the the Murto. And the person who had baturday previous told me he had seen Ao a had boy enter the house Twice, eaid he made A mistake it was not hime. The people of the house alss denied or any one engaged the Ow a fos, the now in prison for the unlawful Although therefore the Care broke down from the pritive were want of any cvidence that. Mr. Lobscheid and It's a loy personally Commcter with the he. Siphong I think it follows, more especially Considering the Character of the Chimere; the As a loy any was all knowledge of them thing else. The charge naturally therefore Sell too the ground; but in addition to the statements that vm. Ithaheid has chosen to publish. I have now the Testiming fully aware of the existence of this Aing; and it would seem reasonable to expect that Chinese for Mr. Lobscheid having had dealings with the Chose
2026-05-19 17:27:53 · Baseline
View content

bound

board

all the Fine Convinced

not more

to do with her

her

#

of the man who

proceedingo-

The "Portland.

aering

who rells

as

346 "werkrever

i

me

مة

to is flock on this day the Cumminses

against Mr. Lokscheid and

as much

the above report

unas

the Case; vinz; that

No a

were

Aund- could be

of

given

in widence

was

given

مد

with this important difference that the printer said that he had mad

mistake when he told

2

a

me to a loy

the Corlies on board the Portland came from

the Kaving Tiring Fat House at

Kroong the Re Http house at Manchai

with

it; that the women

Syngspoon; that

was in Connection

in that house

were

intended for the "Fortland", that Mr. Lotscheid

engaged to a boy who

who is

had taken

away but that it was

the printed notice &

Man

come

one

detention of

there

women

he did not

in the the

Murto. And the person who had baturday previous told me he had seen

Ao a

had

boy enter the house Twice, eaid he

made

A

mistake it was not hime. The people of the house alss denied

or any one

engaged

the

Ow a fos, the

now in prison for the unlawful Although therefore

the Care broke down from the

pritive

were

want of any

cvidence that. Mr. Lobscheid and It's a loy

personally Commcter with the he. Siphong

I think it follows,

more

especially Considering

the Character of the Chimere; the As a loy

any

was

all knowledge of them thing else. The charge naturally therefore Sell too the ground; but in addition to the statements that vm. Ithaheid has chosen to publish. I have now the Testiming

fully

aware of

the existence of this Aing;

and it would seem reasonable to

expect

that

Chinese

for

Mr. Lobscheid having had dealings with the Chose

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.